Compliance as a trauma response in children

cropped Martina Gallo.png
Martina Gallo is Content and Events Assistant at ACAMH and a psychologist trained at the University of Buenos Aires. She teaches neurophysiology, assists in child psychological and neuropsychological assessment programmes, and researches at the TANGO‑i Lab. Her interests include mental health, neuroscience, neuropsychology and translating research into clinical practice.

Posted on

A child who smiles and causes no trouble at school is easy to overlook. In the session on mentalising with complex trauma in children and families, Dr Emma Morris described how, in some children who have experienced early relational trauma, compliance may be mistaken for a sign that all is well. A mentalising lens offers another reading, in which compliance may be a way of staying safe, and that reading can shape what support comes first.

Why a compliant child can go unnoticed

In a busy classroom, a quiet and agreeable child can pass through the day without raising concern. Sometimes, though, we gradually come to realise that the child is actually learning little and connecting with few others, and that the agreeableness comes with a kind of absence. At school, that absence may prompt questions about a learning difficulty. Beyond the classroom, a child’s behaviour can be equally difficult to interpret. At home, for instance, a child who does not respond to comfort may leave a parent feeling rejected. Both interpretations are understandable from the adult’s perspective, yet neither necessarily captures what the child is experiencing internally.

These different perspectives came together in a case discussed throughout the session: a seven-year-old boy who had experienced early relational trauma, compliant at school and hard to reach at home.

Compliance can be a way of staying safe

In assessment, something else came into view. The boy had no words for feelings and agreed with whatever was suggested to him, yet contact with him felt disconnected. Beneath that compliance, he seemed highly alert to risk, braced for the next bad thing to happen and working from a position of epistemic mistrust, even though his manner looked engaged.

In mentalisation-based treatment (MBT), explicit mentalising (the capacity to reflect on thoughts and feelings and how they relate to behaviour) depends on a certain degree of attention control and emotion regulation. When a child’s difficulties sit at the level of attention, asking him what someone else might be feeling is unlikely to land.

Why the order of support matters

When a child’s guard is up, it can be difficult for him to take in new information or make use of the support being offered. That applies to reflective work, and it can apply to strategies aimed at attention or behaviour. For this boy, questions about his development were put on hold while the first aim of therapy was to help him feel safe enough to connect. Gradually, he became more open to the people around him and better placed to use the help on offer.

Making safety and trust the starting point can feel slow, particularly in services under pressure to act quickly. It also means treating small gains in connection as progress in their own right.

Safety shows in small signs

In joint sessions, the boy often drew while his mother and the therapist talked nearby. His mother learned to show gentle interest in his drawings without the praise and questions that had made him shut down. Together they watched for cues: his shoulders dropping, his expression softening, a glance up when something caught his attention, moving himself a few centimetres closer. These signs were small and easy to miss. His mother also learned to recognise when contact became too much, and to step back.

At school, the adjustments were similarly modest. Teachers asked whether it was all right to ask him a question, or whether he would prefer to be asked later. When a question did come, he could choose from options that included saying he did not know or did not want to answer yet. Small attempts to take part were praised, and other children saw that having a go mattered more than getting things right. Over time, he began to come out of himself a little more in class.

Closing

A quiet, compliant child makes few demands on a classroom or a stretched service, and that may be part of what keeps such children out of view. Work with these children often moves at their pace, and much of it may rest on adults who are willing to look beyond the behaviour itself, remain curious about what the child might be experiencing, and recognise small changes when they come.

Where next

Free Ebook

Free Infographic

ACAMH Resources

FREE CPD/CME certificates when you watch/listen to any of this content from ACAMH Learn.

Mentalising in Work with Children and Families: An Introduction

Dr. Emma Morris provides an introduction to key concepts mentalising work with children and families.

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*