Relational trauma: looking beyond the child

Martina Gallo is Content and Events Assistant at ACAMH and a psychologist trained at the University of Buenos Aires. She teaches neurophysiology, assists in child psychological and neuropsychological assessment programmes, and researches at the TANGO‑i Lab. Her interests include mental health, neuroscience, neuropsychology and translating research into clinical practice.

Posted on

When a child has been affected by relational trauma, it might be easy to assume that the child is the one who needs to be treated. But in practice, working with the child matters just as much as working with the adults who care for them and with the everyday relationships the child lives inside. That second part seems to be the one most easily overlooked.

The instinct to treat the child

There is a familiar instinct, when a child is struggling, to think of help as something the child goes off to receive: a referral, a series of appointments, a course of therapy, and ideally a child who comes home a little better. For some difficulties, that is a reasonable way to think. But it is a harder fit for difficulties that began in relationships.

Children who have lived through frightening or unreliable early care often learn, understandably, that closeness is not safe. That lesson does not stay behind when their circumstances change. It travels with them into new homes, including loving ones. These children may be more reluctant to give up control and tend to keep at a distance the very people trying to offer them warmth. These responses make sense as something learned: it is what early experience taught them to expect.

What makes this complicated is that, when a child’s difficulties are rooted in relationships, healing often has to happen through relationships too. Therapy can create an important space for trust to begin, but it cannot carry that work alone. For many children, ordinary moments play their part in that change: being comforted after a nightmare, being met with patience rather than punishment, and discovering, again and again, that an adult stays.

Where this leaves the carer

This places the parent or carer somewhere they may not expect to find themselves. Much of what helps a child recover does not happen in an appointment. It happens in the hours the carer spends with them, which makes the carer central to the work rather than peripheral to it.

That might seem like a demanding place to be. Caring for a child who pushes care away can be quietly depleting. The adult offers warmth and is met with rejection; offers patience and is tested past it; and, often, begins to wonder whether they are simply not good enough at this. A carer in that state is not helped much by a new set of techniques. What they tend to need first is to feel that someone understands how hard it is and that their exhaustion is a reasonable response to a genuinely hard situation rather than a sign of failure.

Yet services do not always act on this. Support is often aimed at the child, with the carer treated as a kind of delivery mechanism for the intervention. But a carer who feels blamed, depleted, or alone is in a poor position to offer a child the steady, patient presence that change depends on. Supporting the carer, then, is part of the treatment itself.

What this asks of practitioners

None of this displaces careful assessment, attention to attachment, or direct work with the child where that is needed. It does shift where some of the attention goes. It suggests spending real time understanding the carer’s experience, not only the child’s behaviour. It means noticing when a carer is running on empty and treating that as something clinically relevant. And it calls for resisting the urge to move quickly to advice, since a carer who does not yet feel understood is unlikely to be able to use it.

There is also something here about expectations. Families are sometimes promised, implicitly, that treatment will resolve the child’s difficulties. When progress turns out to be slow and uneven, as it usually is, that promise can leave everyone feeling they have failed. It is gentler and more honest to be clear from the start that progress takes time, that much of the work happens through everyday relationships and routines, and that the adults involved will need ongoing support to keep going.

Closing thoughts

The shift is subtle, but important. It is less about introducing a new model or technique, and more about reconsidering where clinical attention is placed. If the relationships around a child are as central as they seem to be, it is worth asking whether services are set up to support them or whether carers are too often left to manage alone. The question of how to hold and sustain the adults around a child seems an important one to keep asking.

Where next

Free Ebook from the session

Upcoming webinars

Maltreatment, Trauma-Related Disorders, and Their Interplay with Neurodivergence

Prof Helen Minnis leads a session about the trauma and stressor related disorders of childhood, known as Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder (DSED). These are disorders thought to be ‘caused’ by maltreatment (abuse and neglect). We aim to raise your awareness about RAD & DSED and to enable you with the skills to recognise associated behaviours in children and young people who you work.

Intergenerational Consequences of Racism

Explore intergenerational consequences of racism and its impact on family mental health in this ACAMH expert webinar. Learn how structural racism cascades through generations and how practitioners can respond with trauma‑informed, anti‑racist approaches. Dr. Yasmin Ahmadzadeh leads this session.

Trauma: Evidence, Practice, and Implementation Challenges. Jack Tizard International Online Conference

The sessions dive into the practical challenges of identifying and treating trauma in children and young people, with an emphasis on implementation issues, barriers to delivering evidence-based treatments, and work with specific populations. Confirmed speakers; Professor Rachel Hiller, Dr. Jess Richardson, Dr. Connor Kerns, Dr. Stephanie Lewis, and Professor Dr. Elisa Pfeiffer. 

Recovery and Justice following Child Sexual Abuse

Laura Smith, Clinical Lead for ‘The Lighthouse’ the first Barnahus service in England, delivers a talk and Q&A on ‘Recovery and Justice following Child Sexual Abuse: Lessons from the Lighthouse’.

Adversity, Protection, and Prevention: Rethinking Childhood Experiences Through New Evidence

Explore how adversity, protection, and prevention shape child and adolescent mental health at this ACAMH expert conference on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). Learn evidence-based strategies to reduce risk and build resilience in children and families.

ACAMH Learn free talks

Intergenerational Trauma

Trauma

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*