OCD and BDD in young people: rethinking causes and access

Martina Gallo is Content and Events Assistant at ACAMH and a psychologist trained at the University of Buenos Aires. She teaches neurophysiology, assists in child psychological and neuropsychological assessment programmes, and researches at the TANGO‑i Lab. Her interests include mental health, neuroscience, neuropsychology and translating research into clinical practice.

Posted on

  • Tags:

Two shifts in childhood OCD and body dysmorphic disorder are worth paying attention to. Several environmental risk factors long taken for granted may be less directly causal than once assumed. And the bottleneck in helping young people seems to lie less in what works than in who can reach it.

Familiar disorders, less familiar questions

For most clinicians working with children and adolescents, OCD is a familiar disorder. Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is recognised more often now, although it is still easily missed. Both conditions are well described, their first-line treatments long established, and the value of early intervention rarely questioned. So what is there left to say?

Quite a lot, as it turns out. What has shifted is not so much the treatments themselves, but the way the field thinks about where these disorders come from, alongside a growing recognition that having effective treatments available in theory is very different from young people actually being able to access them.

What recent evidence is actually saying about causes

For many years, explanations for OCD in young people tended to focus on specific life events or experiences. Clinicians and families often looked to factors such as complications around birth, childhood infections, parenting styles, bullying, or traumatic experiences when trying to understand why symptoms appeared. In the clinic, parents commonly ask whether something during pregnancy or an illness early in life may have contributed to the onset of their child’s OCD.

What recent evidence suggests, however, is a more complicated and less linear story.

Genetically informed studies from large Scandinavian registers are quietly rewriting parts of this conversation. OCD is moderately heritable, with twin estimates around 40–50%. Once shared family factors are controlled for through sibling comparison and other quasi-experimental designs, several classic risk factors shrink. The link between early childhood infections and later OCD, for example, appears largely explained by shared familial liability rather than the infection itself. Perinatal events do retain a small genuine signal, and violent victimisation seems associated with later OCD even within sibling comparisons. Many “causes” once spoken about confidently may turn out to be markers of vulnerability.

This changes the way these conversations happen in the clinic. Rather than looking for one specific event that directly caused the OCD, the picture is usually more complex, involving underlying vulnerability and the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. For parents who feel guilty about pregnancy, infections, or their parenting, understanding that complexity can sometimes bring a sense of relief.

The gap between effective treatment and real-world care

CBT with exposure and response prevention remains the first-line psychological treatment for paediatric OCD, with SSRIs considered for moderate-to-severe cases. Less often discussed is a more practical problem: in many parts of the world, specialist treatment is difficult to access at all.

Recent trials of internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) suggest that a stepped-care approach using therapist-guided ICBT first can achieve outcomes comparable to in-person CBT at six months while using substantially less therapist time. Around half of children may never need to step up to face-to-face treatment. Early feasibility studies in adolescents with BDD suggest a similar approach may be possible there too, although the evidence base remains smaller and ICBT is not a substitute for specialist care in more complex cases. For adolescents who never reach a clinician, scalable forms of treatment may be one of the few realistic ways to narrow the gap.

The case of BDD

Adolescent-onset BDD is more common than many clinicians assume, particularly among girls, and carries a striking burden: high rates of social impairment, school non-attendance, self-harm, and elevated suicide risk. Recent population-level data suggest intentional self-harm is several times more common in BDD than in matched controls and that for many the first recorded self-harm event precedes the diagnosis. Underrecognition has familiar drivers: secrecy, shame, low insight, and easy misattribution to “normal teenage self-consciousness” or to comorbid depression, anxiety, or eating disorders. Without direct questions about appearance preoccupations, repetitive checking, grooming, distress, and impairment, the diagnosis could be missed.

What this means in practice

Three quiet shifts seem worth holding in mind:

  1. Causal language around environmental risk factors in OCD may require more caution than it once did. Framing these disorders in terms of vulnerability, interplay, and uncertainty often serves families better than confident attributions.
  2. Where stepped care and digital pathways are available, they function as a realistic route into evidence-based care, rather than a second-best option.
  3. BDD rarely announces itself openly, particularly in adolescents, and the cost of missing it can be high.

Closing thoughts

Taken together, these developments subtly change the clinical picture around childhood OCD and BDD. The shift is not dramatic enough to overturn existing practice, nor does it challenge the foundations of good care: careful assessment, ERP-based CBT, judicious medication use, and family involvement remain central.

What does seem to be changing is how clinicians think about these disorders more broadly. There is growing caution around simple explanations for why OCD develops, greater awareness of how difficult it can be for families to access evidence-based treatment, and increasing recognition that BDD in adolescents is often missed despite significant distress and impairment.

The next major gains may not come from entirely new treatments. They may come from getting better at recognising vulnerability, asking better questions, and making effective care easier to reach.

ACAMH Resources

FREE CPD/CME certificates when you watch/listen to any of this content from ACAMH Learn.

OCD and Me – This film features Olivia’s powerful account of living with OCD from childhood, exploring both the compulsions people see and the intrusive thoughts they don’t. Her story sheds light on the hidden challenges and misconceptions surrounding OCD.
Talk: 15 mins. Level: Introductory

OCD and me with Olivia

Parenting A Child With OCD Kitty, co-founder of the Charity Nip in the Bud shares her personal story of parenting a child with OCD in a time with limited awareness, prevalent stigma and little resources.
Talk: 6 mins. Level: Introductory

Parenting A Child With OCD Kitty Nabarro
Which Treatments Work for Pediatric OCD? Efficacy and Acceptability of CBT and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Which Treatments Work for Pediatric OCD? Dr. Matti Cervin discusses his JCPP paper.
Podcast: 33 mins. Level: Introductory, In Practice

References

Aspvall, K., Andersson, E., Melin, K., et al. (2021). Effect of an internet-delivered stepped-care program vs in-person cognitive behavioral therapy on obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 325(18), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3839

Brander, G., Pérez-Vigil, A., Larsson, H., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2016). Systematic review of environmental risk factors for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A proposed roadmap from association to causation. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 65, 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.011

Brander, G., Rydell, M., Kuja-Halkola, R., et al. (2016). Association of perinatal risk factors with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A population-based birth cohort, sibling control study. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(11), 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2095

Cervin, M., McGuire, J.F., D’Souza, J.M., De Nadai, A.S., Aspvall, K., Goodman, W.K., Andrén, P., Schneider, S.C., Geller, D.A., Mataix-Cols, D. and Storch, E.A. (2024). Efficacy and acceptability of cognitive-behavioral therapy and serotonin reuptake inhibitors for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a network meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatr, 65: 594-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13934

Heyman, I., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fineberg, N. A. (2006). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 333(7565), 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7565.424

Krebs, G., Clark, B. R., Ford, T. J., & Stringaris, A. (2025). Epidemiology of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Appearance Preoccupation in Youth: Prevalence, Comorbidity and Psychosocial Impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 64(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.01.017

Mataix-Cols, D., Boman, M., Monzani, B., et al. (2013). Population-based, multigenerational family clustering study of obsessive-compulsive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(7), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3

Mataix-Cols, D., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Isomura, K., Anson, M., Turner, C., Monzani, B., Cadman, J., Bowyer, L., Heyman, I., Veale, D., & Krebs, G. (2015). A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents With Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(11), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.08.011

Mataix-Cols, D., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Beucke, J. C., et al. (2024). Heritability of clinically diagnosed obsessive-compulsive disorder among twins. JAMA Psychiatry, 81(6), 631–632. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0299

Mataix-Cols, D., Pol-Fuster, J., & de la Cruz, L., et al. (2026). Familial confounding and causal inference in child and adolescent neurodevelopment and mental health. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00045-3

Pol-Fuster, J., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Beucke, J. C., Hesselmark, E., Crowley, J. J., de Schipper, E., Brikell, I., Chang, Z., D’Onofrio, B. M., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2025). A Population-Based Multigenerational Family Coaggregation Study of Severe Infections and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Biological psychiatry, 97(7), 672–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.09.004

Pol-Fuster, J., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Isomura, K. et al. Association between bullying victimization and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a population-based, genetically informative study. Mol Psychiatry 30, 2457–2462 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02849-2

Rautio, D., Isomura, K., Bjureberg, J., Rück, C., Lichtenstein, P., Larsson, H., Kuja-Halkola, R., Chang, Z., D’Onofrio, B. M., Brikell, I., Sidorchuk, A., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fernández de la Cruz, L. (2024). Intentional Self-Harm and Death by Suicide in Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Biological psychiatry, 96(11), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.05.006

Zhang, T., Brander, G., Isung, J., Isomura, K., Sidorchuk, A., Larsson, H., Chang, Z., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fernández de la Cruz, L. (2023). Prenatal and Early Childhood Infections and Subsequent Risk of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Tic Disorders: A Nationwide, Sibling-Controlled Study. Biological psychiatry, 93(11), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.07.004

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*